The universe that is the Big Bang theory doesn't end in a Black Hole, it ends in a White Hole

The universe of Hard, is the universe that doesn't end in a black hole but ends in a white hole. Thats is Andrew Cohen's universe. I shouldn't be saying this but im just having fun. Im letting the cat out of the bag. I suppose it is my training in the dark arts that has brought me to this place. I struggled a lot with the dark arts in a magic/purple level of worldveiw. Read Ken Wilber for further reading.  I understood what it was like to say the word fuck. It was quite liberating to be honest. Thanks Ken.

Black Magic on Osho

When Osho was sent to jail, he claimed that some people did some black magic on him. Apparently there were a few people in his community who had sinister motivation. But i think the interesting thing is that Osho wasn't interpreting his experience correctly. Unfortunately Osho wasn't aware of the 4 quadrants, the theory of everything by the Einstein of consciousness, Ken Wilber. It wasn't those people that were against him that had sinister motivations, merely. It was those that were closest to him that had sinister motivations, namely Maa Anand Sheela and those closest to Osho. It was them that practiced black magic when they poisoned the poor people of that town they were in America. Its ironic that he claimed that he was poisoned when he was in jail.

The benefits of Atheism

Atheism is the conviction that there is no god. There are many benefits to this conviction. Firstly if there is no god that means that we have to rely on ourselves. We cant expect any being outside of us to do anything for us. I grew up in an atheistic culture, and that culture is doing pretty well. That culture is the culture of Dubai. From that point of view there is no point in god because what on earth can god do for us. Infact Atheism is a completely rational philosophy. And whats wrong with being rational. The only problem with rationality is that you cant touch reality in terms of reason. But you can get pretty fucking close. Thats the problem with the devil. The devil is actually an atheist. But for some reason the devil is seen as something very bad. Not really, the devil is simply question gods Empire like hold on the Universe. Theres nothing wrong with questioning the empire. The devil's actually a pretty smart guy. One of gods favorite children actually. Don't forget the devil is an angel.

Infinite intelligence

Scientists say that we have a certain IQ that we are born with and that is more or less the level of intelligence in which we are destined to operate within in this lifetime. But do you really think that the cosmic intelligence that created the universe was going to burden us with a fixed level of intelligence that we were stuck with for our whole lives. I think that we have a certain potential that is given to us from past incarnations or if you're a judeo-chrisitian-muslim that was made by the Creator. The thing is we do not know what that level of intelligence is because we cannot know our own minds. Because if we did know our own minds then we would be absorbed in it 24 hours a day and we wouldn't get anything done. Thats actually what it was like before the universe was created. The universe wasn't created by the big bang. It was created at an indetermined time in the past. And is going to go on for an indetermined time into the future. Thats what an infinite universe looks like. If the universe is in fact infinite it could not possibly have started at the big bang, but it had to have come from nothing, literally. The problem with the big bang theory metaphysically is that it seems to suggest that since the universe started from a singular point that means there is some singular point to which it is going to fall back into at the big crunch. But that means that universe has some fixed point it is going to go to, and its all over. I dont think that is true because that would mean that the universe had a serious end. And we would all have to squish ourselves through that one small point at the moment of the big crunch in order to get to the other side. And the chicken didn't cross the road to get to the otherside.

Don Bradman vs Sachin and others. Why Bradman was the greatest and the others don’t come close.

Now that Sachin Tendulkar has come to the end of his playing days we can start to ask what his place in history is. Many make the jump to say that he is the greatest batsman of the modern era and perhaps the greatest batsman that has ever lived. But I strongly disagree, and I have reasons for it. Do I think Sachin is the greatest batsman of all time, the answer is definitely not. Do I think he was the greatest batsman of his era, then I would say yes, but I would be hesitant to say that, because what is our definition of a great batsman in the first place. There are many ways to define a great batsman for example, how many runs does he score, how quickly does he score his runs, how efficient is his batting with regard to the target score, what is his average, how many runs has he scored in his career, how many times as he been man of the match, how entertaining is he. In many of these categories of batting sachin surely ranks at the top of most of them. But does that automatically make him the best batsman of his era. Perhaps some of these categories are more important than others, but which ones. I can layout my opinion on which of these categories sachin is on top, and some of these will be self evident and factually concurrent. But which categories do I choose to give more importance to, which categories best define the characteristics of a great batsman.

I think the category that most defines a great batsman is scoring efficiency. That would be how many runs does he score with regards to the target score. And that tends to include some of the other categories if not all. The reason I feel that scoring efficiency is most important is that, it includes all other categories. The only category it doesn’t include is the total runs scored in ones career. Because scoring efficiency is measured match by match whereas total runs scored is spreadout throughout a career. In this regard sachin is far and beyond every one else and can be counted as the undisputed king of batting. But does that necessarily make him the greatest batsman of all time or of his era.

Here is where I make my second point.

One of the characteristics I believe of a great batsman is longevity, and that perhaps might be the defining characteristic of a great batsman. Now ofcourse what longevity is will vary depending on what one considers longevity. The question remains how long anyone stays at the top of his or her game. Longevity is closely related to amount of runs scored throughout ones career, but they are not necessarily the same. Longevity tends to include all the other definitions of what a great batsman is, but runs scored does not although there is a correlation between runs scored and the other categories. For example someone who has a high average and scores quickly at a high efficiency may have scored many runs in their career. And Infact it is likely that they have. But it is possible that someone who hasn’t scored that many runs has a high average and scores quickly and efficiently. And it is possible that some one who has a high average and scores quickly and has a high efficiency and does not have many runs scored throughout their career , but yet has longevity. And the vice versa is also true that someone who has a high number of runs scored throughout their career and has a high average and scores quickly and has a high efficiency in all three categories relatively speaking, but yet doesn’t have longevity.

Now let me get back to the categories of a great batsman once again. If we look at the categories we can see that sachin is by far number 1 in runs scored and runs scored throughout his career. Now another point I wanted to make was that scoring efficiency is not just related to the target score when chasing runs, but also has to do with what a good score would be in order to win a match when batting first. But scoring efficiency doesn’t stop there. It also includes how quickly one scores runs and how often one scores runs when a certain score needs to be reached a priori to knowing what that score would be. And that ofcourse means knowing how much would be needed in order to achieve the end result which is either reaching the target score that the opponent has set or reaching a score that the opponent cannot reach. And here lies the key, reaching a score that the opponent cannot reach. There are very few batsmen that I could put in these two categories of reaching a target score and reaching a score that the opponent cannot reach and neither category includes Sachin Tendulkar. The batsmen that I would put in these two categories include Virender Sehwag, Sanath Jayasuriya, MS Dhoni and Michael Bevan.

Sachin Tendulkar played cricket for the records, he never played for winning the match, he never played for scoring efficieny. All he ever cared about was his own records. And that would be fine if cricket was an individual sport. If batting itself was an individual sport then that would be fine too. But It is not, we cannot remove batting from its consequences, which is winning or losing a match. Therefore a player’s performance should and always be tied to the actual result, which is did the performance help or hinder the teams actual ability to win. And in terms of greatness, how much did the performance help or hinder the teams actual ability to win.

Longevity doesn’t mean playing forever. Longevity means being able to perform at your highest level for a significant period of time and Bradman did that, he was as good a cricketer when he started as when he finished.

The great barack obama

The great barack obama.

Barack obama is a the great leader of our time. What has he had to face. Can you imagine what it was like for him when boston got attack by 2 troubled teenagers. We all witnessed a terrible tragedy. 

Terrorism is a great threat to world solidarity. There have been many terrorist attacks since the beginning of the wars. 

We have been treated to the worst crimes of humanity that i have ever witnessed in my lifetime. 

But there is hope. We can see the light at the end of the tunnel. Barack obama is going to finish his presidency. And the results of the greatest american hope story will be known. 

Oh you take my breathe away

A poem

When you post a message on my facebook wall
The whole world lights up and i take the fall

Then you go away
Then I go astray
and I am left with no one to play
Oh you take my breathe away

I am just a kid at heart
but I only know what came before
before I knew of Adam and Eve
before I knew of the garden of eden
and the apple and the tree

Strawberry fields forever – The Beatles

Song review

The song starts of with an easy melody, followed by the verse and into the chorus. There is an array of beats and sounds and tunes that if you listen carefully you can hear in the background. The lyrics display a psychedelica alones that if one has ever taken the drug perhaps is understandable, and aims to transmit that quality to the listener. As for the music itself, there is a psychedelic symphony that blends in nicely with psychedelic lyrics and background tunes. The instruments being used include Drums and Trumpets and a Sitar, which is used as an Indian psychedelic instrument that naturally produces the effects that is trying to be made by the rest of the instruments as well as the singing. There is subtle changes in tune that allow the listener to feel the music with the subtelties of ones listening abilities. The lyrics display a poetic theme  as in the words “that I think, I disagree”. And ofcourse the lyrics strawberry fields forever that is repeated throughout the song in the chorus, refers to the psychedelic high and the desire to have that go on forever. And at the end of the song there is a period of silence, and then the comeback and the let go.

Now you see me

Review

The movie starts of with some street magic and mentalism played on some unsuspecting victims. The four horsemen are gifted magicians and mentalists. They each discover that they have been chosen to join a secret organization, but first they need to pass a test. They need to have perfect faith that they will succeed at the test in order to join the Eye. Which is a magical organization much like fraternities and sororities in universities, but this organization is codified in true magical and mystical esoteric fashion. This organization is part of the western esoteric tradition of magic and occultism. The Knights Templar comes to mind. And in fact the four protagonists are known as the four horsemen.

The four horsemen possess certain magical powers, that consist of elaborately planned illusions as well as very real psychic mentalism and magic. The four members are chosen to be part of a magical esoteric organization known as the Eye. The members each have a capacity for knowing way beyond the capacity of most people. They have access to a field of psychic knowing especially one character in particular who is a mentalist, who relies mostly on the psychic dimension to divine facts about his environment and the people within his environment. He also has the capacity to hypnotize individuals as well as mass numbers of individuals.

The magicians use misdirection to deceive their audiences that the trick is happening in one location when they are actually happening somewhere else. They understand the power of illusion and how it is virtually impossible for anyone to find out how they do their tricks. This is where morgan freeman steps in and assumes the role of trying to debunk the magic of the four horsemen.

The magicians are so advanced intellectually and technologically that they are able to use the inter-connectivity of the world wide web and its application to cellular technology in the most creative ways. They must perform their miraculous feats in blind obedience to the eye, in order to succeed in their mission. They are being protected by an unknown force that is watching their every move, this unknown force we later find out to be the Eye itself. But they don’t know where the Eye is or how to contact it, they must trust that they are being looked after and that no matter what they will be okay.

 Rohan Ravi

The Great Great Gatsby

Movie Critic.

 

The Great Gatsby.

There seems to be a consensus within the movie of the suspension of the understanding of who Gatsby is. The first few minutes has you wondering if you will  see Gatsby at all until perhaps the very end where he will appear and disappoint us all. But Gatsby appears when you least expect him, right after the first few minutes. This suspension leads to a kind of melancholia as one is waiting and wishing for the protagonist to show himself, not know whether he will or he won’t. When the protagonist finally does show up on the screen one is left with awe and wonder at the fact that he appeared at all, and one is relieved that the story can go on.

There is a sense of the party ethic in the 20^th century ballroom dancehall format. There is concert pianist playing Bethovhen symphonies shadowed by the sense of the 21^st century disc jockey. Gatsby is young and fit, quite contrary to the opinion of some within the movie and without the movie that he is Old and fat. He lives in a palace and he is oxford educated, and has an acute sense of hearing, perhaps psychic even, but undeveloped, merely superficial.

The movie has an interesting mix of musical styles in the form of modern operatic theatre in such varieties in the manner of Florence and the Machine. To the downright early 2000s contemporary in the form of Jay Z, shouting his mantra H to the Izzo. Ofcourse this all blends nicely to the form of the movie which takes on a Moulin rougeske style longing for the future in a world that exists in the past, and rooted in the present.

Perhaps the most telling scene of the state of the protagonist and his sidekick come at a gather of prominent figures in city of which they live. Here we see the commissioner and a senator as well as the most gripping performance by an Indian movie icon in Amitabh Bachan. For all of bollywoods terrible acting jobs, here Amitabh, the godfather of Indian cinema holds his own in a world he cannot possible understand due to its complexity. But his performance holds gravitas and takes the viewer on a journey of what its like to outperform seasoned veteran actors in your first real test as an actor.

In darkness I have wept for the bond of life I accept this lonely paradise.

Rohan Ravi.

Musical Score 3.5/5

Acting 4/5

 
Entertainment Value 5/5

Screenplay 3.5/5

Overall 4.5/5

Dubai's modern and post-modernization

 

I had just finished having my lunch at the metro station. There a philipino lady was serving mer some delicious indonesion cuisine. I had a conversation with her a few days back on how dubai is becoming so multicultural that we are eventually heading into postmodernity. This is a startling discovery for me, because I have been against the modern emphasis in dubai for a long time. But to slowly start to discover post-modern influences heading into the country is quite something. The interesting thing about dubai’s rapid modernization and now potentially post-modernization, is that dubai is still completely ethnocentric. If dubai continues at a rapid pace into-postmodernity as it did into modernity. We are going to have a very interesting mix going on in dubai. The culture wars as we know it would take on a completely new dimension in dubai, whose laws are governed by Shariah law. Which is very interesting when you look at the global challenges we face, and dubai could play a major role in meeting some of those challenges.  ---> More to come.  

What is your idea of heaven?

What is your idea of heaven? What would you really like happen if you can make it happen? Those are the words of Alan Watts. And this is our assignment.

 

Is there a heaven up in the sky, or is heaven down here on earth. Or is it both in heaven and on earth. Which one would you prefer? An earthly heaven or a heavenly heaven.

 

I know that I would much rather live on earth and make earth into heaven, because heaven is already heaven and that’s not that interesting. Heaven is obviously very interesting, but what does heaven look like. How good can heaven become. Because if heaven is really heaven, then wouldn’t that have to mean that I could get better forever.

 

What would heaven look like if I was able to manifest it. What kind of heaven would I create. How would I make it. I think I would make it so that anyone could enter. But I would try to stop people from not coming into heaven. I would leave them as they were. I would let them grow at their own pace. I would much prefer if they came to heaven, but I want them to feel like they have free will.

My life as an aspiring poker pro

I have spent the last 3 or 4 days in a state of constant movement. It all happened when I decided I was going to try and become a professional poker player. My life was lit up with the thrill of possibility. I’ve always wanted to challenge the status quo, and I was doing it in every dimension but in the dimension of money. And money is what this world respects, unfortunately. But never the less I am here. I found a way through the mess and the rubble of this world.

The thing is if you want to challenge the status quo you have to be willing to challenge everything. In the past the spiritual life did not include money. This was the traditional approach, they relied on donations from outside parties. And even to this day many spiritual organizations require donations from outside parties. Of course this is evolving as we do. Because in the past the best relationship to money in spiritual circles was no relationship. And that still is the best relationship to money. But no relationship doesn’t stop there, no relationship becomes right relationship.

The evolutionary universe

The evolutionary universe comes in two different shades. The first is the view of traditional enlightenment, and it is a view or a perspective. The other is the view of evolutionary enlightenment which is also a view and a perspective. The main point that evolutionaries are making is that we have to have a view of reality. I think this is true in some cases. But I don’t think we always have to have a view of some sort. Because if it is true that we always have a view than we don’t need to have a view in order to have a view. That is one of the eight fold path in Buddhism, no view is right view. This has similarities in evolutionary and the traditional form of evolutionary. Where the goal is always either right view or no view. The goal in evolutionary is right view,  but the way to get there is through no view. The way to get to no view in the traditional approach is also no view, all though that no view leads to right view, but it doesn’t lead to evolution.